I am reviewing the book “Now What? The Young Person’s Guide to Choosing the Perfect Career” by
Nicholas Lore. Even though the title mentions “young person”, I found it very helpful for myself (over 40) because it combines lots of different features: personality traits, career interests, subject interests, etc. that you can find in a variety of career books while bringing all the information together in one unit.
Part 1 is “How to Choose a Perfect Career”. I’m a little iffy on that because, first of all, I skipped it entirely (the first 14 chapters) in part because I was already in a career at the time and second, I’m not completely convinced there is a “perfect” career.
I used this book right after I got laid off and I went to right to Part 2 (“The Career Design Toolkit”) and to Part 3 (“The Career Finder”) . The most useful section, in my opinion, of the “Career Design Toolkit” was the section on Who You Are, which covers natural talents, personality traits, job functions, and natural roles.
The natural talents chapter appears to me to be somewhat similar to the
Highlands Ability Battery Test which covers such areas as analytic problem-solving, diagnostic problem-solving, spatial/nonspatial orientation, visual dexterity, number memory, etc. These traits are all covered on a high level in this book, to give you clues and a rough idea of what might be your talents. (Presumably, if you worked directly with Mr. Lore and his career coaching services, you would get tested for more definitive, accurate answers in this area.)
Other chapters cover the Myers-Briggs personality traits, the concept of “Maestro” vs. “Tribal” – a Maestro digs deep into a subject; the Tribals work in the “human beehive”. Lore also discusses your roles in another chapter – natural ones, such as Parent or Child; public ones – such as Politician, Marketer; roles grouped by Myers-Briggs personality types – such as Visionary, Advocate, Counselor for NF personality types.
As you read each chapter, you “work the clues” (for the “perfect career”) by seeing which roles, natural talents, personality traits resonate most with you and how you perceive yourself.
Two other key chapters concern job functions and subject matters of interest. Job functions, as Lore says, “are at the center of all jobs”. Lore emphasizes how critical job functions are to your career on a day-to-day basis. “If you’ve got a few career paths in mind, zero in on the primary task and activities you are expected to do throughout the day. Remember, employers hire and pay you to do specific tasks.” So, it is key to look at tasks and clusters of related tasks to see if those activities would appeal to you day in and day out.
With respect to subject matters of interest, you can do a test right in the book wherein you rank 5 activities within groups of 8 example activities from 5 to 1 (5 = most appealing) to end up determining which main topics (e.g. social sciences, or arts & entertainment) is most appealing to you.
Once you’ve gone through all these chapters, you’ve got an idea of who you are and where your interests lie. Now you can go forward into Part 3 of the book which is a series of charts and career profiles that combines the different pieces of information so that you can determine careers that best “fit” your talents AND your personality traits AND your favorite roles AND your favorite subject matter, etc.
Bottom line, I found this book to be extremely helpful in crystallizing my own career choices moving forward. It’s not that I never knew some of this stuff but that I’ve never encountered in any other career book the synthesis of all the different information: the Myers-Briggs, the roles that appeal to you, etc. It’s all brought together in such a way as to point you to a path to go down. You can see how the different aspects (your roles, your natural talents, etc.) really do all fit together better than you might expect, AND that there is something in the World of Work which you can do, and offer. That’s what really appealed to me.
I would recommend this book to anyone, and don’t be put off by the reference to the “Young Person”, as it is equally useful to workers already out of college.